Someone even composed a mnemonic that went: “If the Naomi be Klein / you’re doing just fine / If the Naomi be Wolf / Oh, buddy. (And perhaps the fact that Klein’s reputation was intact perpetuated the sense, essential to a Twitter pile-on, that someone’s good name was still at stake.) People were confusing the two Naomis so often that a subset of jokes began to do the rounds: “The real victim in all this here is Naomi Klein,” “Thoughts and prayers to Naomi Klein,” and so on. People stirred up by Wolf’s tweets would start yelling at Klein, wondering what had scrambled her political commitments, how the author of No Logo and The Shock Doctrine, who had devoted her career to studying the excesses of corporate power, could have come to this. People stirred up by Naomi Wolf’s tweets would start yelling at Naomi Klein online, wondering what had scrambled her political commitments.Ĭollateral damage in the saga was the writer Naomi Klein, who kept getting mistaken for Wolf in the fog of online indignation. Was this really the same Naomi Wolf, the author of a widely read feminist treatise, The Beauty Myth a longtime contributor to the liberal newspaper The Guardian a familiar face on MSNBC-a fixture in liberal media since the 1990s? What had happened to her? Each time that she declared, usually via Twitter, that Anthony Fauci was Satan, or that children who wore masks had lost the ability to smile, that the vaccines were a “software platform that can receive uploads,” or that she had uncovered a plot by Apple “to deliver vaccines nanopatticles that let you travel back in time,” ripples of consternation followed. In the first year of the pandemic, Wolf reliably drew fresh surprise and dismay when she made outlandish claims about the tyranny of public health measures and the dangers of vaccines. A notable feature of her career has been her ability to repeat the act of self-immolation over and over, singeing others along the way. Those rules have somehow not held true for the writer Naomi Wolf. A reporter who got their sources mixed up once will surprise no one next time they bungle a story a writer who spreads conspiracy theories is soon known as a crank. Credibility is finite, and once it’s gone, there is not much left to burn. Torching your own reputation is usually a onetime engagement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |